Victim hypocrisy as a weapon

There have been several suicides associated with the tropical Soddom & Gomorrah better known as Little Saint James and even better known as 'Epstein Island'. Most of them have been women who were at some point in their lives employed as models. The details of their suicides are invariably scant on motivation and high on implication. Most media outlets are quick to include disclaimers when they sate their rubberneck readers with breaking news of the client list details. Just because records exist of multiple visits to Little Saint James doesn't necessarily mean that the celebrities being named and shamed were purposely engaging in deviant sexual activity. This does evoke the obvious question of what exactly they were there for? Perhaps it was the unprecedented access they would get to other celebrities and influencers. Or maybe it was to enjoy the balmy tropical climate or possibly even the astounding coral reefs in the US Virgin Islands. 

Let's get real for a moment. Obviously these celebrities were visiting Epsteins complex for the purposes of abject hedonism. Due to their high profiles within their industries, they are considered to be persons of interest by the intelligence community. In fairness, if you happen to have any opinions whatsoever, the demented freaks in the intelligence community will label you as a 'POINT' and they manufacture them all the time. Consequently it doesn't really have any meaning at all. Nonetheless making multiple trips to Epstein Island does not look good and most of the named and shamed celebrities are feeling quite nervous currently. As well they should because they are in the process of being thrown down the stairs by the previously mentioned intelligence community. Regardless of whether they engaged in deviant sexual activity, they are effectively guilty by association. This leaves them in a precarious position where they will undoubtedly have to either blatantly pay the intelligence community for protection or they will have to offer some other form of currency in the form of unswerving fealty to their blackmailers.

Every single one of the celebrities and influencers being doxxed will be assets of a variety of intelligence agencies. Those who do indeed have a proclivity for sexual deviancy will be the prized assets of a specific set of intelligence groups. Regardless of their status, they are being skewered on the pitchfork of public opinion, which is being wielded with an understandably reactionary zeal. The hypocrisy of these agencies is staggering. They pick and choose their assets based on a single factor - profitability. Right and wrong just do not feature in their decision making process. Furthermore the colour scheme of the Judean Temple of Epsteins island corresponds with the so called 'Good Men' cult of pre-inquisition Europe. According to many records the Good Men were indeed a noble and chaste collective of pious and devout men. However there is also extensive evidence that implicates them in some profoundly disturbing practices. Which one of the records is to be believed depends on the agenda of the reader. 

What can be assured is that in recent times, these colours are associated with a cult of sexual proclivity and blackmail. Visit any openly gay bar or nightclub and you will see men with shaved heads wearing white t-shirts, jeans and white trainers. This has been the case since before homosexuality was legal. Such artists as Jimmy Somerville or Depeche Mode would regularly be seen sporting such wardrobes in their pop videos. Whether this is in fact the same cult or even has anything whatsoever to do with Judaism is less clear. Epstein did (and maybe still does) identify as Jewish and the Inquisition did target Conversos. They were Jews who kept their Judean faith hidden and worshiped as Christians, primarily to be accepted by European society. Christopher Columbus himself was a Converso, worshiping as a Catholic but actually originating from a Sephardic culture. Far from representing a contemporary Inquisition, the intelligence agencies are more akin to the corrupt factions of the Nazi party in the 1930s/40s. People who have no moral fibre, no ethical compass and perceive the human race as a resource to be plundered.

While it is difficult to feel any empathy for Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, The Duke of York, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Stephen Hawkins, Alec Baldwin, Sarah Ferguson et al, it is possible to perceive them as victims of intelligence agencies. It seems that celebrity status is a double sided coin. On one side is the adulation of the public and who knows maybe even scope for the inspiration of others. On the other is the horrific and unrelenting experience of being relentlessly predated upon by the most deranged people on Earth. These deranged sociopaths justify their malevolence through the vehicle of virtue signalling victim status. They were robbed of choices during formative years therefore anything antisocial or predatory that they do is somehow justified. As has been mentioned many times on these pages, these people are not weighed down by the millstone of rationale. They are in fact, as insane as any other victims of a deliberate process of trauma based mind control. Without resorting to blatant anti-semitism, it should be pointed out that the defence of many human rights breaches committed against Palestinians are defended by the waving of the 'Holocaust' banner. Anyone speaking out against the policies of the Likud Party is dubbed as an anti-semite. Anyone speaking out against the gargantuan lies of WW2 is labelled as a 'Holocaust denier'. Anyone in the British Labour Party speaking out against the control methods employed by MI5 & MI6 is also labelled as an anti-semite. It has become the 'go to' for lazy thinkers who have little by way of a valid rejoinder when it comes to criticism of their goals or actions. 

Perhaps the most egregiously false facet of this mechanism is that a huge percentage of these intelligence operatives claiming to be Jewish are not. They are actually descended or associated with Khazars who infiltrated Jewish society in times past. They couldn't care less about the Talmud or the Torah and consider their ethno-religious affiliation claims to be justification enough. Anyone can take on the trappings of this clique and thereby wave the "you can't get me because I'm in my den" flag anytime they like. While this sounds somewhat ludicrous it does actually represent the status quo. 

The Orthodox Jewish community known as Neturei Karta stand alone against the galloping ideology represented by the falsehood of the intelligence groups mentioned above. They are quite outspoken in terms of condemning the actions of the Likud Party and consider Israel itself to have been a profoundly damaging event in the history of the Jewish people. According to their interpretation of the scriptures, the Jews were supposed to wait for a time of the creators choosing to found their holy land. It seems that instead they acted on a decision made by the British politician Lord Balfour. While Balfour may have been an aristocrat it seems unlikely that he was actually the creator. Likewise his interlocutor in the Rothschild family may have carried major sway in the Bank of England but that's hardly proof of being the creator either. What could be interpreted from the Balfour Declaration is that the Rothschilds (like many other families) carry a gene from a previous hominid paradigm. The phrenology of both old kingdom Egyptians and the Paracas people includes a longer skull than Northern Europeans. Many of the Rothschild family do indeed display traits of these genes. However as has been detailed many times by TEFLONRABBIT, these people were 'small g' gods and certainly not the big G man himself. This plays into the rather challenging reality that the entirety of the Abrahamic faith system was simply an enormous mind control campaign designed to deny homosapiens free will, informed choice and self determination. While this could be interpreted by Christianity, Islam and Judaism as being massively heretical thinking, the evidence is impossible to dismiss.  

The interactions between Homo Capensis and Homo Sapien have been referenced elsewhere on this website. More commonly known as the 'Long Skulls' they were (and possibly still are) a people who did not use speech, facial expressions or writing. This may or may not have anything to do with an obsession with 'hidden meaning' displayed by certain social groups currently active in forming world politics today.  The nature of world politics today represents more of a cult of personality than it does anything to do with democracy. Consequently having influence in this environment has little to do with leadership and everything to do with superficiality, leverage and increasingly, sexual proclivities. 

The cult of the 'Good Men' were by all accounts celibate. They, like the Albegensians and Cathars, were of the opinion that divorcing oneself from the desires of the flesh lead to a greater understanding of the spiritual realm. Unfortunately for them, most people disagreed quite emphatically. So extreme was the reaction that the Cathars were all burned to death and their castles bombarded into oblivion. The 'Good Men' were outlawed by the Spanish Inquisition and many of those sympathetic to their cause were also burned to death. While this appears as a somewhat harsh response, the population of the Earth was considerably smaller during these times. Humanity was still recovering from major cataclysm and as such, fertility was still actively encouraged and worshiped. Anyone espousing celibacy as a life choice was considered to be working against re-population and as such the will of God. Today the global population is some fourteen times greater and consequently, fertility is considered as something that our ancestors valued but that does not really have much significance today. Nonetheless thanks to the advertising industry and humanities enduring interest in things of a sexual nature, heterosexuality is still considered to be the single greatest motivating force that the world has ever known. Attempting to separate humans from their desire to procreate is no small undertaking. It has faced extreme opposition in times past and has been co-opted by interest groups formulating their nonsensical and contradictory rhetoric under the banner of the #DePopulation Agenda. 

While the scandals associated with Epstein Island appear to be primarily heterosexual in nature, they are associated with sex trafficking and pedophilia. Consequently the rest of the human race seeks to condemn anyone who availed themselves of the hedonistic pursuits offered by Epstein and Maxwell. The resultant backlash in the media is highly convenient in terms of distracting the masses from what somebody is doing behind the scenes. Two years ago the only subject anyone was discussing was related to the psy-op known as Covid-19. Many people were completely outraged by the behaviour of their national and local governments. To prevent anyone focusing too long on possible reprisals, the war in the Ukraine and the Israel / Hamas conflict were pushed to the fore of all major news outlets. Now everyone has a new tub to thump and the teasing of the public with the names of celebrity transgressors is highly effective in this regard. Meanwhile the Earth has been enveloped by thousands of tile sized satellites in a much lower orbit than any previous constellations. While it would be easy to discount any connection between these events, it does seem somewhat convenient that everyone was cooped up at home while Elon Musk pushed ahead with his 'Starlink' network. 

In previous articles, TEFLONRABBIT has covered the horrific reality of humans having their minds read by remote ECG infrastructure contained in low earth orbit satellites. If a global campaign of psychological control is to be rolled out effectively, distracting the population would be key to it's success. The increasingly obvious agenda of distraction pursued by Reuters and other news outlets is critical in terms of distracting the population. In effect it is an ongoing Kansas City Shuffle. in the great tradition of slight of hand, the population is invited to look over here while somebody does things that they wouldn't like over there. 

When the Epstein scandal broke and he was incarcerated, Ghislaine Maxwell openly stated that she was 'going into hiding' which she promptly did. It then took several months for her to be brought up on charges during which time her whereabouts were apparently unknown. This entire narrative is so riddled with utter horseshit that it's impossible to reconcile. Given that they were both involved with every intelligence organisation in the English speaking world (and probably others as well) there's absolutely no way that she could have avoided detection. As Epsteins familiar and fixer she may have been versed in some counter intelligence methods but it's extremely unlikely that she could have escaped the attentions of the handlers of those on the client list. This means that various people including Epsteins legal counsel Alan Dershowitz were more than likely complicit in aiding and abetting a high profile fugitive. The delay in any charges at all being brought against her speaks to how reluctant the intelligence community were to further disturb this sizable termite mound of corruption. This is nothing new. The various five eyes intelligence agencies are notorious in terms of protecting known transgressors. In fact they go even further and create persons of interest simply to justify their existence. 

The notorious groomer and offender Jimmy Saville was facilitated by the British civil service throughout his long and sordid career. Numerous whistle-blowers including John Lydon outed him in public and were completely ignored while he continued on with his horrific tour de force. So ingrained was Saville in the establishment that he counted numerous high profile figures such as the then Prince of Wales and now King of Britain, Charles of Windsor among his personal acquaintances. In addition it was known that he had private quarters in several care homes and secure units which he visited regularly for the purposes of abusing patients / inmates. The picture above was taken in Broadmoor secure hospital and shows Saville introducing celebrity boxer Frank Bruno to notorious murderer Peter Sutcliffe AKA 'The Yorkshire Ripper'. Sutcliffe specialised in murdering prostitutes and was the focus of a major manhunt in 1980. So widespread was the fear of Sutcliffe that the entire British public were looking over their shoulder after dark. It's broadly accepted that he, like numerous other serial killers could not have perpetrated such murder sprees without coming to the attention of various intelligence agencies. Bruno maintains that Saville tricked him into meeting Sutcliffe but it's difficult to conceive of how exactly this deception could possibly have unfolded. LIke Epstein, Saville was considered by most to be somewhat of a character. His extensive charity work gave him unparalleled access to high profile celebrities and among the more conspiracy orientated pundit he is suspected of being a high ranking member of various secret societies / cults. 

It's impossible to ignore the consistent theme of guilt by association that is attached to the names of many high profile individuals. While most will denounce the accusations when they hear them in social circles, the ongoing exposure in the media rebukes these unqualified defences.